Cancer type: not selected    

No matching data was found in our database.

Try searching using another selection.

Please write to us for comments.


Please note:

Select a cancer type or medication name above to display results

Please also review about cancer as well as how to use data and disclaimers.


This is NOT a comprehensive list of all the cancers or all treatment options. Only select cancers and trial results are included.


Main Context Cancer Type and Info Drug or regimen Get Data




Cancer type: not selected    

Cancer Type and context Drug or regimen Outcomes: Study vs Control    Show Statistics

Select trials from Trials List or Drugs by Stage to dispaly data.

Please write to us for comments.






Cancer Type: Not selected

No matching data was found in our database.

Try searching with cancer name only.

Please write to us for comments.


Please note:

Not Applicable for the current selection

Select a cancer type to display results


Please write to us for comments.

Please also review about cancer as well as how to use data and disclaimers


Early stages
(Generally, stages 0, 1, 2 and 3)

Drugs:

No drug data available
Regimens:

No regimen data available

Late stages
(Generally, stages 4 or not amenable for local therapy and sometimes stage 3)

Drugs:

No drug data available
Regimens:

No regimen data available

Cancer type: Not selected

(for general understanding only)
growthPromote other growthInhibit outsideCell

TUMOR RESPONSE ASSESSMENT AND CLINICAL ENDPOINTS IN CANCER RESEARCH

Introduction

Effectiveness of cancer treatment is usually established based on outcomes assessed in clinical research. The benefits of cancer treatment are assessed using one or more measurable parameters (clinical endpoints).

A clinical endpoint is an event or an outcome that can be measured objectively to determine if a treatment or any intervention is beneficial. The intended purpose of a treatment may vary and may include shrinkage of the tumor, improvement in survival, decrease the probability of cancer progression, quality of life, improvements in symptom, cure from cancer etc. One or more such benefits may be assessed in a research trial. Since the anticipated benefits of a treatment may vary, clinical endpoints used are not always the same for different clinical studies.

Each aspect of benefit may be assessed by one or more specific clinical endpoints. Hence, every clinical trial includes one or more clinical endpoints to measure the benefits. Research scientists identify and decide on the specific clinical endpoints to be used to assess depending on the intended benefit of the treatment, type of cancer, previously available data, etc.

Even though each clinical endpoint used in a study provides a measurable parameter, this should be viewed in a narrow sense as specified in the definition of that parameter. Benefits identified based on one clinical endpoint may not mean a benefit in another related endpoint. For example, treatment may improve survival without causing shrinkage of tumor. Similarly, a treatment that reduces the tumor size may not improve overall survival. Some treatments may improve the symptoms without acting on the cancer. FDA has published a guidance for the industry on clinical trial endpoints for the approval of cancer treatments1.

Back to contents

Types and Phases of Clinical Research:

Clinical trials provide us with measurable evidence if a treatment or an intervention is beneficial. Study may also provide additional information such as side effects and safety information. Clinical trials may be performed to identify a new treatment, a new preventive method, methods to improve quality of life etc. Each study has to be designed specifically with specific sets of endpoints depending on the purpose of the study.

Generally, pre-clinical (laboratory) studies are done to identify a potential new medicine. Once a promising molecule or method is identified, clinical studies are done to demonstrate benefits in humans. These clinical trials are done in a stepwise fashion with different purposes at each phase. Each early phase provides key complimentary information such as toxicity data, preliminary evidence of a benefit, tolerance etc. which are needed prior to proceeding with more advanced and expensive later phases of research. Clinical trials phases generally are grouped as Phases 0 to 4. Phases 0 and 1 are done in a small number of individuals to answer key questions such as safety and the most appropriate dose. Phase II studies may provide evidence of a treatment benefit. Phase III studies compare new treatment against the current treatment. Phase IV studies are done on the treatments that are already in clinical use and assess their safety over time.

Back to contents

Comparative Vs. Noncomparative Studies:

Comparative studies are designed to compare endpoints between 2 or more interventions. An example of a comparative study is a controlled study, where one of the comparative arms includes a control group which could be a current standard treatment or a placebo (controlled study). Comparisons may also be between different doses, regimens etc.

While controlled studies provide a higher level of evidence, it is not always possible, feasible or required. These trial designs may be used when use of placebo is not ethical or when natural history of the condition is well established. These types of studies are commonly done in oncology field. Single arm trial is an example of a Noncomparative study where participants are given the experimental therapy and then followed over time to assess response.

Back to contents

Randomized Vs. Non-randomized Studies:

Randomized Vs. Non-randomized refers to assigning patients or participants to different arms of the study in a comparative study. In a Non-randomized trial people are allocated to different interventions using methods that are not random. Randomized studies randomly assign participants in a balanced manner to different treatment or groups. This reduces several biases such as selection bias and allocation bias.

Back to contents

Open Vs. Blinded trial:

An open trial is where information about the treatment and group allocation is open to both the researchers and the participants in a comparative study. Blinding refers to withholding certain information from the individuals involved in the study that may somehow influence them in various ways and may create potential bias.

A study could be blinded study where various aspects of the treatment are hidden from the participant, researcher, or individual measuring the response during the study and will be revealed at the conclusion of the study. A study could be a single blind, double blind, or a triple blind study. Blinding is commonly employed in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) which are historically considered the gold standard in clinical evidence.

Back to contents

Assessing Tumor Response:

Clinical endpoints includes tumor response assessments (size, amount and activity of tumor) as well as various types of survival and adverse effects data. Tumor response to cancer treatment may be assessed using several different parameters such as anatomic size, biochemical parameters, quantifying tumor cells in the blood or bone marrow etc depending on the caner type being studied. Several different endpoints may be used in combination.

Anatomic Tumor Response:

For solid tumors the size of which can be measured, imaging modalities such as CT scan, MRI scans etc are used to measure size of the tumor before, during and after treatment to assess measurable response. When there at=re multiple cancer lesions, a limited number of target lesions may be selected for measurements. To ensure uniformity, various standards for measurements such as RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), modified RECIST, WHO criteria etc are established. These criteria may be periodically updated to improve accuracy of interpretation (Ex: RECIST version 1.02, RECIST version 1.13).

Biochemical and molecular Response:

For some cancer which are associated with measurable tumor markers or other biochemical abnormalities, response can be assessed based on improvement in those parameters. Prostate cancer response can be assessed based on improvements in PSA (prostate specific antigen) level. Several blood/bone marrow malignancies are assessed based on abnormal proteins produced (Ex. 'M' protein, free light chains, immunoglobulins in myeloma and some types of lymphoma) or measurements of abnormal clones in blood or bone marrow (Ex: molecular response assessed using BCR-ABL transcripts in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia)

Survival Data:

In some situations, objective evidence of tumor shrinkage to a treatment may not translate into a survival improvement. This may happen if adverse effects of the treatment may cause or contribute for the reduced survival. Hence, while objective response (tumor shrinkage) is important, overall survival is considered the most important endpoint in cancer clinical trials. However, estimating overall survial may be impractical in several situations where a slow growing cancer is associated with a long survival or if several other treatments are available which may be used after the study which may affect overall survival. Hence, all the clinical endpoints have their limitations. When a clinical endpoint is difficult to measure, a surrogate endpoints may be used. A list of adult surrogate endpoint table is available in FDA website (Accessed: November 6, 2022)4.

Back to contents
Major clinical endpoints used in cancer research:

Clinical Endpoint Description*
Overall Survival (OS) The length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment to death from any cause.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) The length of time during and after the treatment for a disease, such as cancer, that a person lives without disease getting any worse than before (without progression). PFS is defined as the time until objective tumor progression or death.
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) Time from randomization to evidence of radiographic disease progression or death.
Relapse free Survival (RFS) or Ddisease-Free Survival (DFS) Length of survival after definitive cancer treatment without any evidence of cancer relapse (or recurrence).
Event-free Survival (EFS) Length of survival after definitive cancer treatment to disease progression, death, or discontinuation of treatment for any reason or initiation of a new treatment without documented progression. EFS is not commonly used and similar to progression free survival.
Time to Progression (TTP) Length of time until objective tumor progression. TTP does not include deaths. TTP does not count patients who die from other causes but is otherwise a close equivalent to PFS.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Percentage of patients who had measurable response (as specified in the study) to the treatment. Responses could be complete (Complete Response) or partial (Partial Response). Stable disease (SD) includes patients whose disease remains stable without a response or progression.

The term ‘Major Response” commonly indicate responses that include complete response (CR) as well as partial responses (PR). Some cancer response assessments include specified responses such as pathologic complete response (pCR), very good partial responses (VGPR), cytogenetic response, molecular response etc.
Duration of Response (DoR)) Length of time from randomization to disease progression or death in patients who achieve response (complete or partial).

* The definitions of clinical end points may slightly vary from one study to another.
Back to contents




References:

1. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/clinical-trial-endpoints-approval-cancer-drugs-and-biologics (Accessed: November 7, 2022)
2. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:205.
3. Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:228.
4. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/table-surrogate-endpoints-were-basis-drug-approval-or-licensure (Accessed: November 6, 2022)